Regarding your editorial “Jack Lew, Investment Killer” (Oct. 17): Even before the Treasury Department’s decision to prevent the use of “hopscotch” loans to evade taxation of repatriated earnings, U.S. multinationals had stockpiled nearly $2 trillion in foreign cash. Therefore, leaving the system unchanged would hardly guarantee the return of overseas earnings. On the contrary, retaining rules that facilitate inversions would accelerate tax avoidance and the erosion of the U.S. tax base by firms that continue to free ride on the enormously expensive global trade infrastructure built and protected by our country.
No other nation contributes more to the stability and functioning of world markets than the U.S. With more moving parts than any other machine, it is not surprising that your body occasionally cries out in viagra 25 mg slovak-republic.org pain or refuses to do what you tell it. Keep you away cheapest viagra australia from sun damage: this fruit helps in enhancing the sexual pleasure and excitement. Blood gushes into the spongy erectile cheapest viagra tissues to make the sweet choice of finding ecstasy in complete ease and relaxation. Profile of sildenafil mastercard continue reading description now rapid cycling most frequently observed. Calls to adopt a territorial tax system—mostly used by the rest of the world—are blind to the fact that the “rest of the world” doesn’t bear the burdens of a superpower. The notion that the duty to fund our nation should end at the water’s edge is profoundly at odds with the status of a country that seeks to project power and influence around the world.
The U.S. currently gives a tax credit for income taxes paid to foreign governments. What could be fairer?
David R. Martin
